For criticizing insecurity in Sokoto, activist Hamdiyya sentenced to two years in prison, N50,000 fine or 12 strokes of cane
In a controversial ruling that has sparked widespread debate over freedom of expression, an 18-year-old social media activist, Hamdiyya Sidi Shariff, was sentenced to 12 strokes of the cane, or two years in prison, or a fine of Fifty Thousand Naira (₦50,000) by the Sokoto Chief Magistrates’ Court.
The verdict was delivered by Chief Magistrate Faruk Umar on Thursday, following Hamdiyya’s arrest on November 13, 2024.
Hamdiyya maintained that her intentions were to raise awareness about the pressing issues affecting her community
Hamdiyya was detained for expressing her concerns about the rising wave of killings and insecurity in Sokoto State through her social media platforms.
Her posts, which lamented the deteriorating security situation, led to her being charged with inciting public unrest.
The case has drawn significant attention both locally and internationally, with many human rights advocates condemning the ruling as an infringement on free speech. Rights groups argue that citizens should be allowed to voice their concerns about safety and governance without fear of retribution.
During the court proceedings, Hamdiyya maintained that her intentions were to raise awareness about the pressing issues affecting her community, rather than to incite violence or unrest.
Her defence team argued that her sentencing sets a dangerous precedent for other activists and citizens who wish to express their opinions.
The ruling has ignited protests in Sokoto and beyond, with activists calling for the immediate release of Hamdiyya and the protection of free speech in Nigeria. Demonstrators have taken to the streets, holding placards that read, “Justice for Hamdiyya” and “Freedom of Speech is a Right.”
As the country grapples with issues of security, governance, and civil liberties, Hamdiyya’s case is poised to become a pivotal point in the ongoing discourse about the role of social media activists in Nigeria and the boundaries of free expression.
The international community is watching closely, as many emphasise the need for legal reforms that protect the rights of individuals to voice dissenting opinions without fear of persecution.
Hamdiyya’s fate now hangs in the balance, as her legal team considers their next steps in appealing the sentence.
It very unfortunate how public officials abuse (usurp) power. I am so disappointed that this kind of order was issued by a ‘Magistrate of a Nigerian legal institutions’.
This acts signals and affirms the unpatriotic nature of some judges in our courts.
A Magistrate or Judge must first recognized that whatever powers he thinks he have, it is a mere privilege by the Institutions he serves that empowers him.
I think this Magistrate should be dismissed for such order. It badly represents our justice system